[lsst-dm-stack-users] Changes to make sub-images less clunky

[Dustin Lang]

> 	im(x, y)		Same order as our C++ (and boost::gil)
> 	im[y, x]		Standard python convention

I think that proposal follows the principle of least surprise in both cases, so 
I agree that it's a good solution (for my $0.02).

--dstn

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Robert Lupton the Good wrote:

> Mario proposes
> 	im(x, y)		Same order as our C++ (and boost::gil)
> 	im[y, x]		Standard python convention
> and (unless there's some technical reason I don't see) I think that that's a 
> good solution.  I'll be filing an RFC to the list and a ticket when I get a 
> moment, unless someone gets there first.
>
> 							R
>
>