[lsst-dm-stack-users] image.getArray() question

[Mario Juric]

On 2/10/14, 14:18 , Robert Lupton the Good wrote:
>> An optimal thing would be to allow the other convention by overloading
>> __call__, e.g.:
>>
>>   img(x, y) = blah
> 
> You can write img(x, y)[:] = blah -- this is already useful:
> 	exp.getMaskedImage().getImage()[:] = 1
> works
> 
> But on the main topic, there's no consistent answer to the (x, y) v. (y, x) convention question.  Sorry.
> 

Can we sprinkle some syntactic frosting to enable:

	exp.maskedImage.image[:] = 1

(where ...image is an ndarray-compatible object), and then the transpose
is simply:

	exp.maskedImage.image.T

? Or does swig make this difficult?

-- 
Mario Juric,
Data Mgmt. Project Scientist, Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
Web : http://research.majuric.org     Phone : +1 617 744 9003

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 274 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://listserv.lsstcorp.org/pipermail/dm-users/attachments/20140210/4e4c34e7/attachment.sig>